ItÕs Almost Not Me: Effacement, Dexterity & the Confessional Utterance in Jack MyersÕ IÕm Amazed that YouÕre Still Singing

 

 

Recovery Project by Nate Pritts

 

 

 

 

In the field of lyric poetry, where dinosaur-sized egos stomp over the plains smashing up the sensibilities of readers everywhere with heavy-handed references to actual life as if experiencing something automatically evolves a poem ready for flight, Jack Myers was & still is an anomaly.  In MyersÕ work you find a deft language, lines & poems that touch on the personal & merely use the self & its travails as one more ounce of raw material for a poem that is ultimately not as connected to the actual ÒcredÓ of the situation itself as it is to something overarchingly human.

                I came across Jack Myers & his understated revelation IÕm Amazed That YouÕre Still Singing in the summer of 1999 while working towards my MFA in the low-residency program at Warren Wilson College.  I was, at that point, writing confessional cluster narratives, poems that were fluent & flexible in the way they strung together bits & pieces of my experience but which were also limited by this subject matter, trapped in the self.  I was not, nor have I become, a particularly interesting person so you can imagine the string of poems I was producing & how esoterically devoted to the cult of (my) personality they had become.  My every move / thought was mythologized, dissected & ultimately connected to something within me.  My teacher for this semester was Tony Hoagland & he had passed along a list of books, 50 or so ÒessentialsÓ for our times & Jack Myers was listed.  I dug up a copy, probably through PowellÕs or ABE Books, & instantly saw a new path, one that actually led somewhere.

ItÕs my contention that so much of our first person poetry doesnÕt lead anywhere interesting, or anywhere at all.  These poems quickly get bogged down in the particular and actual self of the author, trying to dazzle readers with stunning achievements, exotic locations or categorical identities that rely more on accidents of birth than anything earned or accomplished in the poem itself.  There is so much more potential in a poetry that communicates sensibility, a thought process rather than particular thoughts, poems that reflex the living of life.  Certainly personal experience is one of the tools available to communicate this, but the danger here is always that the poem will substitute experience for insight, rhetorical flourish for the sympathetic utterance.  Myers, especially with this book, shows us one way to go.

In the poem ÒThanksgiving Day,Ó Myers demonstrates how the use of personal materials can be shaped through the forge of lyric insight into something that is transcendent of its particular concerns.  Ostensibly located in the inertial haze engendered by the holiday of the title, the poem tracks around to larger questions of identity:

 

                My parents called today and asked me how I am.  Boxcars and boxcars

                of blunt questions have been clacking over me, so IÕve lost

                even the feel of what I am.  In a few days, youÕll drive back

                and knock me out again.

 

The implication here is that the self is something that is generated in response to, that the questions of the parents elicit & produce one more separate version of the self that threatens to subsume any sense of an identity with integrity.  Later, when the ÒyouÓ comes back to Òknock me out again,Ó the speaker indicates another falling out of the self, another clarification.

The speaker is left with a world in which heÕs prohibited from a distinct & lasting conception of the self, as a result of outside influences:

 

                I will have changed another thousand times and still be

                terrified of the glare of your approach.  I will be still

                standing here in layers, trying on selves as if I were

a fire sale—This roar must be me going up in flames.

 

ThereÕs such amazing power in experiencing these lines, feeling our own way into them precisely because they are not intricately coded.  They do not depend on your understanding of this particular Thanksgiving, or even Thanksgiving in general; these poems employ a sensibility—deep uncertainty over the unity of the self, an insiderÕs view of person struggling towards hope & a reconciliation between the inner needs of the individual & the constraints placed on us by others.  WeÕre left with a poem that is decidedly confessional & personal while not being limited by that, a sensibility that is generous in letting the reader understand the larger conflicts rather than forcing them to simply witness one personÕs triumph &/or failure.

In the poem ÒKnock Turn,Ó Myers directly addresses the subject of maturing into manhood, of learning to live in the world:

 

                EverythingÕs important and nothing matters.

                ThatÕs how I learned to be a man, years of

                hanging in the streets, learning how to

                stand and take it, give it, get it back.

 

                Each night weÕd go for something big and crazy

                at the wide end of experience, so weÕd have something

famous to talk about, make the sun shine off our teeth.

 

That idea of having Òsomething/famous to talk aboutÓ is exactly the folly IÕm talking about.  ItÕs a young personÕs mistake, thinking you can dip into the well of experience & bring up something that, on its own, will make you more than what you are. Throughout this collection (itÕs 1981, from LÕEpervier Press), Myers engages the reader quietly, through direct & bare utterance with the realization that life is just life.  Uncomplicated by any substantial dependence on particulars, weÕre given an actual consciousness, poetry that demonstrates a living self for the reader to inhabit on the page.  Surrounded on all sides by poems that try to convince us that the writer is more cultured or interesting or various than we are, & that, by extension, their poems are worth reading, we need Jack Myers & more poems that take the risk of stripping away recitative biography as a way of leaving the reader with something more luminous.